Indian cricketer Mohammed Shami has recently found himself in the eye of a storm after being labeled a “criminal” by a Muslim cleric, Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Bareilvi, for not observing Roza (fasting) during Ramadan.
The controversy erupted during India’s semi-final match against Australia in the ICC Champions Trophy, where Shami was seen hydrating on the field. This incident has sparked a heated debate about the intersection of religion, professional commitments, and personal choices.
A fast bowler or any player can’t do fasting while playing any sport. Even the French National Football Association bans Muslim players from fasting during Ramadan.
The Cleric’s Criticism Of Mohammed Shami ” A Criminal”
Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Bareilvi, President of the All India Muslim Jamaat, criticized Shami for not adhering to the religious practice of fasting, which is considered a compulsory duty in Islam. He argued that Shami’s actions sent the wrong message to the public, stating, “If he is playing, it means he is healthy. He did not observe Roza or even have water in such a condition. This sends a wrong message among people.”
Shami’s Defense and Stellar Performance
Shami’s coach, Mohammed Badruddin, came to his defense, emphasizing that national duty should take precedence. “Desh ke aage kuch nahi (Nothing comes before the nation),” he said, urging critics to prioritize the country’s interests over religious practices. Shami’s performance on the field, where he claimed three crucial wickets, further underscored his commitment to the team and the nation.
The Hashim Amla Parallel
Adding fuel to the debate, many have drawn comparisons to South African cricketer Hashim Amla, who famously scored an unbeaten 311 runs in a Test match against England in 2012. A widely circulated misconception claims that Amla was fasting during this iconic inning. However, Amla himself clarified in a press conference that he was not fasting at the time due to the physical demands of the match. He said he would observe the missed fasts after returning home, as Islam allows travelers to defer fasting.
This revelation highlights the importance of verifying facts before forming opinions and underscores the flexibility within religious practices to accommodate individual circumstances. Even if he held the fasting
A Broader Conversation
Shami’s controversy has ignited a broader conversation about balancing faith and professional obligations. While some argue that athletes should adhere to their religious practices, others believe that personal choices and professional commitments should be respected. Shia cleric Maulana Yasoob Abbas dismissed the criticism as a publicity stunt, emphasizing that fasting is a personal choice, not a compulsion.
As the debate continues, one thing remains clear: Mohammed Shami’s focus and dedication to his craft are unwavering. His performance on the field speaks volumes about his priorities and commitment. The incident also serves as a reminder of the need for empathy and understanding in navigating the complex interplay of faith, duty, and personal choice.
In the end, whether fasting or not, Shami and Amla’s stories remind us that athletes are human, too, juggling the same complexities of life as the rest of us. And perhaps that’s what makes their achievements even more remarkable.
FAQs
Q1. Why did Mohammed Shami face criticism during Ramadan?
A. Shami was criticized for not observing Roza (fasting) during a cricket match in the ICC Champions Trophy. A cleric labeled him a “criminal” for skipping the fast and drinking water on the field.
Q2. Who called Mohammed Shami a “criminal” and why?
A. Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Bareilvi, a Muslim cleric, criticized Shami for not fasting, claiming it was a sin and sent the wrong message to people.
Q3. How did Shami’s coach respond to the criticism?
A. Shami’s coach, Mohammed Badruddin, defended him, emphasizing that national duty should come first and praising Shami’s performance.
